GALE Databases
These are a sampling of topic-specific article databases from Gale that may be useful to you.
TOPICAL FOCUS, TERMS, CONCEPTS
Navies: Navies provide countries with the ability to access and dominate other countries that may not share a border with them.
American -- British -- French -- Japanese -- Russian -- Chinese
Racism: Depicting the inhabitants of a Country as ‘less than/inferior,’ ‘other,’ ‘backward,’ ‘in need of saving,’ ‘deserving or domination/predisposed to domination’ ‘heathen,’ ‘savages (or Noble Savages),’ ‘hordes,’ and other similar ideas of is typical of a nation’s imperial project.
Resistance/Responses: Despite the dangers of resisting imperial domination, people around the world resisted nonetheless with varying degrees of effectiveness. Sometimes these efforts began immediately to prevent foreign domination while in other cases they began after the dominant country took control. Resistance efforts varied in terms of armed resistance, nationalizing foreign firms, and peaceful protest.
Zulu -- Ethiopian -- Maori -- India -- Cuba -- Comanche -- Nez Perce -- Philippines -- Crimea/Dagestan
Sub-Topic: Devolution & Semi-Autonomous Regions: Imperialism led to artificial borders in which the people residing within a particular territory did not necessarily see themselves as belonging to a particular state at all. Because the borders were often drawn arbitrarily, in some groups are broken across several countries. Many states have dealt with this effect of imperialism through granting increased autonomy to a particular group/region, while in other cases those territories break away (or attempt to) through peaceful or violent means. Some countries contain many semi-autonomous micro-states or regions. This is typically the result of New Imperialism, but in many cases is the result of state consolidation as far back as the 1400s or earlier, as in the United Kingdom and Spain.
Cooperation: Often times, the ruling elite or another group within a country that was the target of imperial control cooperated with the dominating country in order to gain or retain the benefits of power.
Egypt -- Persia -- India -- Cuba -- Philippines
Cold War Imperialism: After World War II ended in September of 1944 the global order changed. It used to be that there were several powerful countries that cooperated with and competed against each other to maintain dominance of weaker countries and balancing the power of the others--that changed after WWII with the start of the Cold War.
Zulu -- Ethiopian
WARS, CONFLICTS, & BATTLES
This list is not exhaustive, but provides a representative sample of wars, conflicts, and battles that took place as part of the imperial projects of the countries listed below. These conflicts are relatively non-controversial. However, there are wars where the imperial nature of a war is more perspective-based. For example, the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 is widely considered an example of present-day American Imperialism. Yet, this view is not universal.
American
- Spanish-American War
- Philippine American War
- Vietnam War
British
- Opium War
- Anglo-Afghan War
- Crimean War
- Battle of Trafalgar
- Anglo-Russian War
- Suez War
French
- Crimean War
- First Indochina War
- French Algerian War
- Suez War
- Persian Gulf Campaign of 1809
- Punjab War (British East India Company)
Japanese
Russian
- Anglo-Russian War
- Crimean War
Chinese
EVENTS, POLICIES, TREATIES, PROJECTS, & IDEAS
Sykes-Picot Agreement
Berlin Conference & Scramble for Africa
Treaty of Nanjing & Port Treaties
Cultural Imperialism
Economic Imperialism
Gunboat Diplomacy
Orientalism
Open Door Policy
Hegemony
Informal Empire
Legal Imperialism
Direct Rule
Indirect Rule
Sphere of Influence
‘Manifest Destiny’
Frontier
‘Big Stick’ Policy
Colonialism
Neocolonialism
Post-Colonialism
Suez Canal
Panama Canal
Interventionism
Monroe Doctrine
Truman Doctrine
‘White Man’s Burden’
‘Brown Man’s Burden’
MAJOR FIGURES/INDIVIDUALS
While the ideas that historical events are primarily driven by the actions of well-known individuals (‘Great Person’ History) is generally not the most useful approach to history, it is worth considering the actions of prominent proponents and resistors of imperial ambition. This list is not exhaustive, but is a representative sample.
Leaders, Proponents, Supporters, & Collaborators (Individuals and Corporations)
Cecil Rhodes & British South Africa Company (British Industrialist)
Resistors (Individuals and Indigenous Groups)
Shaka (Zulu King/General)